Holman v. DeLin
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action by Edward Holman against the DeLin-RiverFinley Co., a corporation, John P. Finley, and C. R. Rieger to recover under a certain lease assigned to him by T. L. Ray and others. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. There was a judgment against the corporation and J. P. Finley, from which they have prosecuted this appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Wolverton.
The basis of plaintiff’s action is a claim or demand for rent for use and occupation of certain premises, situate in the City of Portland, from October i, 1893, to January 4, 1895, at a monthly rental of $200, payable in advance, alleged to have been assigned to him by T. L. Ray, R. L. Ray, H. Ray, Sarah Ray, J. D. W. Ray, and Mary Ar-buckle, who were and are the owners of said premises as joint tenants. To defeat the action, defendants answer that on September 25, 1889, the owners executed a lease of said premises to the plaintiff and the defendant DeLin, who…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Doty v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Hurley v. LamoreauxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Wheeler v. WaldenNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- McFarlan v. . WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peery v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Keegan v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Backus v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Colwell v. ChernabaeffOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Chilson v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.