Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Early

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1965PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The two defendants, Early and Fuller, were tried to a jury, subject to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, under two indictments charging each with unarmed robbery. Both defendants were found guilty. The cases come here on their appeals with one assignment of error. The error assigned is the denial of the defendants’ motion for a mistrial, which occurred in these circumstances. One Denommee, a police officer of the city of Lowell who had investigated the case, was called as a witness by the Commonwealth and testified with respect to the arrest of the defendants. On cross-examination by counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McGartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Curley v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HofferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. PicklesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. CifizzariMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API