Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Rowland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1939No. 4-5598PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

On July 19, 1938, appellee, T. J. Rowland, filed two suits in the Crittenden chancery court on two- promissory notes. These two notes were secured by deed of trust on real property, and a foreclosure was sought.

By stipulation of counsel, the two causes were consolidated for trial.

Appellants first filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s (appellee’s) complaint on the ground that he was not the owner of the notes in question, hut had previously assigned them to his daughter, Mrs. Dorothy Bowland Bleakney, and had no cause of action for the collection of the indebtedness due on said notes.

The court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Johnston v. SchnabaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. McAbee v. WileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Miller v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Tyson v. MayweatherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greer Limestone Co. v. NestorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McNeill v. PercySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Tucker v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Jones v. HempelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API