Legal Opinion

DowntownDC BID v. Roquois Y Clarke

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Decided October 8, 2024No. 91275100Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: October 8, 2024 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ DowntownDC Business Improvement District v. Roquois Y. Clarke _______ Opposition No. 91275100 _______ Curtis A. Boykin of Douglas & Boykin PLLC for DowntownDC Business Improvement District, Plaintiff. Robert Powers of McClanahan Powers, PLLC for Roquois Y. Clarke, Defendant. _______ Before Wellington, Goodman and Dunn, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Goodman, Administrative Trademark Judge: Roquois Y. Clarke (Applicant) seeks…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API