Toombs v. Citizens Bank of Waynesboro
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia, upholding the constitutionality of the provisions of the Georgia statutes regulating the assessment, by corporate action, of shareholders of state banking institutions whose capital has become impaired. 169 Ga. 115. Section 1 of Art. VI, Georgia Banking Law, Act of August 26th, Ga. Laws, 1925, p. 126, amending Art. VI, Ga. Laws, 1919, p. 135; Ga. Civil Code, § 2366, (48), (49).
Section 1 (printed in the margin 1 ) provides that when the capital of a state bank is impaired the Superintendent shall require the bank to make good…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- South Utah Mines & Smelters v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Stow v. WyseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Smith v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Stevens v. Eden Meeting-house SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Charles L. Canty, United States of America v. Charles M. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. KrugArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BrañuelaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- Burke v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.