Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Fitch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1792PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action upon a note for £200, dated 27th of September A. D. 1769.. Plea — Nonassumpsit. Issue to the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Determined by the court — That under this issue the defendant cannot give in evidence payment of the note; this would be to surprise the plaintiff, when he comes prepared only to prove the promise. The defendant by undertaking to prove payment, admits, that he did promise contrary to his plea; and to show that he is discharged from it, by having performed it. The distinction is, that in an implied promise payment may be given in evidence under the plea of non-assumpsit, for that extinguishes the promise, whichi continues no longer than the duty subsists, but in an express promise, both reason…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robbins v. HarveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  2. Miller v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API