Edwards v. Erie Coach Lines Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentCiparick, J.
Because I believe that a single analysis pursuant to Neumeier v Kuehner (31 NY2d 121 [1972]) should be applied where nondomiciliary defendants are jointly and severally liable to nondomiciliary plaintiffs in a tort action arising out of a single incident within the State of New York, and that under such an analysis New York law should *332apply to all defendants for purposes of uniformity and predictability, I respectfully dissent.
Neumeier sets forth a three-rule framework for determining what law should govern when there is a conflict between the laws of the domiciles of the parties or the state…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- King v. Car Rentals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sullivan v. J.V. McNicholas Transfer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996