Reece v. Haymaker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 299, Oct T., 1894, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 8, Allegheny Co., August Term, 1894, No. 18, on case stated. Case stated to determine marketability of title to real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 299, Oct T., 1894, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 8, Allegheny Co., August Term, 1894, No. 18, on case stated. Case stated to determine marketability of title to real estate. The case stated was as follows : “That Mary A. Reece (who was then and for years prior had been the wife of the plaintiff) died on the 22d day of March, 1890, intestate, and leaving her surviving husband, the said plaintiff, and two minor children, seized and possessed in fee simple, at the time of her death, of lots 3 and 4 in McClelland’s plan of the borough of Turtle Creek; her deed for said lots…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curtam,
There was no error in entering judgment on the ease stated in favor of the plaintiff. All that can be profitably said on the questions involved will be found in the opinion of the learned president of the court below; and on it we affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Buchan v. German American Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Jones v. BealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Philadelphia v. PetersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Baker's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lancaster County · 1942
- Bartholomew v. Langan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1924