Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1959No. 30308PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery, as denounced by Articles 1559 and 1560, V.A.P.C., in that the robbery was alleged to have been committed in a foreign country and the fruits thereof brought into the State of Texas; the punishment, 5 years.

The laws of the State of Chihuahua were introduced in order to comply with the terms of Article 1560, supra.

Cantu, a 61-year-old Latin American railroad worker, took his savings in the form of fourteen one hundred dollar bills to Juarez, where he was to meet a friend for the purpose of purchasing a home in that city. Cantu arrived at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Arsdale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Tones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Willlams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Cassidy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Cassidy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Rayford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Rayford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API