Hayden v. Carey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 13, 1923:
Doerfler, J.
The break in the wire was not discovered until the time of the accident, and while there was no evi*535dence of an eye-witness establishing the cause of such break, nevertheless we are of the opinion that sufficient facts had been proven from which the jury could readily infer that the apple tree in falling struck the wire, breaking it, and causing it to rest, when the accident occurred, upon the broken branches located between the trunk of the tree and the nearest electric light pole. The broken end of the wire through which the power…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nagle v. HakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Lomoe v. Superior Water, Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Brown v. Consolidated, Light, Power & Ice Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Oesterreich v. ClaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Dansbery v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Rude v. AlgiersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Short v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.