Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1979No. 7912SC125Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s failure to dismiss the case against the defendant on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the submission of the case to the jury. The defendant, who appeared pro se, did not move for a dismissal pursuant to G.S. 15A-1227 but did question the sufficiency of the . State’s evidence. Since the defendant was not represented by counsel, the court may consider a challenge to the sufficiency of the State’s evidence which is made in layman’s language, as a motion for judgment of nonsuit. See State v. Whitfield,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. MundySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API