Kanekoa v. City & County of Honolulu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentNelson, Circuit Judge
I dissent from Part II of the majority opinion because I believe that the Hawaii police department’s detention of Damien Melemai, Warren Kanekoa, and Charles Kanekoa violated their constitutional right to a prompt probable cause hearing. The officers detained Melemai and the Kane-koas after warrantless arrests without presenting them before a neutral magistrate for a determination of probable cause for a constitutionally impermissible purpose and for an unreasonable length of time. The fourth and fourteenth amendments and this circuit’s prior decisions require reversal of the decision below.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- James N. Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.