Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kanekoa v. City & County of Honolulu

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1989No. Nos. 87-2636, 87-2844Published

1DissentNelson, Circuit Judge

I dissent from Part II of the majority opinion because I believe that the Hawaii police department’s detention of Damien Melemai, Warren Kanekoa, and Charles Kanekoa violated their constitutional right to a prompt probable cause hearing. The officers detained Melemai and the Kane-koas after warrantless arrests without presenting them before a neutral magistrate for a determination of probable cause for a constitutionally impermissible purpose and for an unreasonable length of time. The fourth and fourteenth amendments and this circuit’s prior decisions require reversal of the decision below.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. James N. Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API