Legal Opinion
Hale v. Scopac
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1907Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered February 10, 2009. The order granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for, inter alia, slander arising out of statements made by defendant Paul Scopac, vice-president of the Clinton Central School District Board of Education (School Board), and defendant Guy Van Baalen, a member thereof, concerning plaintiffs bid to provide bus…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ruggiero v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- DeRise v. KreinikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Preston v. Hilton Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Kassapian v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Miller v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Banigo v. Board of Education of Roosevelt Union Free School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- CALHOUN, DOMINICK v. ILION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.