Legal Opinion

Cridland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-1611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Following our decision in Cridland v. State, 499 So.2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the trial court resentenced the defendant within the sentencing guidelines to twenty-two years imprisonment with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years imprisonment for carrying a firearm. The defendant appeals his sentence as being unlawfully imposed. We affirm.

First, the defendant complains that the scoring of points to determine the 17-22 year sentencing guidelines range was in error. We disagree. It was per*539fectly proper to score twenty-one points for victim injury (death) in this second-degree murder with a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Blanton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sellers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Brown v. Crane, Phillips, Thomas & Metts, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Monzon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API