Legal Opinion

People v. Rogers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1987No. 2—86—0888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

Contemnor, Jack P. Rimland, was defense counsel for Wayne Rogers, who was convicted of murder and armed robbery after a trial by jury. At the conclusion of the trial on June 20, 1986, the prosecutor orally requested that sanctions be imposed against defense counsel for making “talking objections,” making “a personal attack upon the prosecutors,” and for violating the court’s order in limine which prohibited defense counsel from mentioning the death penalty during trial.

The trial court responded to the State’s request as follows:

“Okay. There was a motion in limine, and it was stated by [the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LoughranIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. TomashevskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People Ex Rel. Woodward v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. People v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API