Warrenville State Bank v. Farmington Tp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
KOSC3NSKI, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. Under Michigan’s “Revenue Bond Act of 1933, Public Acts of Michigan 1933”, as amended, and enabling ordinance pursuant thereto adopted by the Township Board, the defendant township, a political subdivision of Oakland County, State of Michigan, and a public corporation, as defined by the Act, on or about October 1, 1940, issued its “Section 36 Water Supply System Revenue Bonds” in the amount of $110,000 for improving, enlarging and extending an existing, but inadequate, water supply system. The bonds were in denominations of $1,000 each, with 4%%…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Young v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Holland v. Clerk of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Supervisors v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Pueblo v. Grand Carniolian Slovenian Catholic Union of United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960