Legal Opinion

Carothers v. City of Stanton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 35,856PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff was employed by the city of Stanton, as chief of its volunteer fire department, at a salary of $25 a year, and, at a fire, he was seriously injured. The department of labor and industry held that plaintiff was an employee of the city and awarded him the minimum of compensation, provided by 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8425.

Upon appeal, defendants contend that such holding is contrary to onr opinion in Hartman v. Village of St. Clair Shores, 216 Mich. 603.

In that ease a volunteer fireman was paid $2 for each fire he attended, provided he was one of the first six to respond. The day the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. Acme Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Village of Creve Coeur v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Buehler v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Laidlaw v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Prange v. Grand Rapids Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API