Legal Opinion

Frank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 11, 1933No. Docket No. 50224Published

Held, that income derived from brokerage accounts opened and operated by the petitioner in the names of his three minor daughters was in fact income of said daughters, and is not taxable to the petitioner.

1Opinion of the Court

EMIL FRANK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Frank v. Commissioner

Docket No. 50224.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

27 B.T.A. 1158; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1237;

April 11, 1933, Promulgated

Held, that income derived from brokerage accounts opened and operated by the petitioner in the names of his three minor daughters was in fact income of said daughters, and is not taxable to the petitioner.

W. C. Magathan, Esq., and S. L. McCormick, Esq., for the petitioner.

Harold F. Noneman, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API