Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Saxl

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 14, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

Objections to the probate of the propounded instrument were interposed by a legatee under a purported testamentary paper of earlier date. It appears that the *482testator also executed a paper on a date intermediate the dates of the propounded instrument and the instrument in which the contestant is named as a legatee.

The objections to probate presented issues as to execution, fraud and undue influence and there was also tried an issue as to whether the propounded paper was executed in duplicate. The proof established that the challenged instrument was a carbon imprint prepared…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of McCullochNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of BrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Estate of Juanita Valcarce (Valcarce v. Valcarce)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API