Blunsden v. Marks
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff filed this action pursuant to G.L.c. 271, §49 seeking to have a promissory note declared void as usurious. This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiff s motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed.
On July 25, 1994, plaintiff Richard Blunsden ("Blunsden”) agreed to purchase a vacant 32,671 square foot parcel of land located oh Peckham Street in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Potier v. A. W. Perry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schwartz v. LevensailorMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002