Legal Opinion

Blunsden v. Marks

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 27, 2001No. 000559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff filed this action pursuant to G.L.c. 271, §49 seeking to have a promissory note declared void as usurious. This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiff s motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed.

On July 25, 1994, plaintiff Richard Blunsden ("Blunsden”) agreed to purchase a vacant 32,671 square foot parcel of land located oh Peckham Street in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Potier v. A. W. Perry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. LevensailorMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API