Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Boot
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2003No. 02-1683PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Maurice Taylor, a pro se Michigan prisoner, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l). Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking monetary and equitable relief, Taylor sued four prison officials (Boot, Wells, Singleton, and Berghuis) at Brooks Correctional Facility. Taylor essentially asserted that the defendants exhibited deliberate indifference to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Henderson v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Barnett v. Christian County JailDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Brown v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Clark v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- David Jason Taylor v. Bruce Todd, et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.