Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Armour Curled Hair Works

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1903No. Gen. No. 10,934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action on the case for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error, as administrator of the estate of Max Schmidt, deceased, sued defendants in error in case for alleged negligence causing the death of his intestate. The jury found the defendants not guilty and judgment was rendered against the plaintiff, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

Defendants were the owners of a brick building at the southeast corner of Thirty-first and Benton streets, in the city of Chicago, about five stories in height, which was used, as appears from the record, for the manufacturing and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevison v. EarnestIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Newkirk v. ConeIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Elam v. BadgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Smith v. BinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Van PattenIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowd v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  2. City of Chicago v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. FowlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  5. Convert v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API