Legal Opinion

Kinzey v. . King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1845Published

1Opinion of the Court

Scire facias against the defendant, to show cause why he should not be fined $40 for not attending as a witness in the Superior Court of law of Henderson County at Spring Term, 1845, in a suit, David Blythe v. John M.Kinzey, in which he had been subpoenaed, his default having been recorded at that term. It was agreed that the following statement of the defendant should be received as evidence of the facts therein contained, to wit: Mitchell King, in answer to the rule, etc., respectfully showeth that he has no recollection that he was ever regularly served with a subpoena or summons to appear…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stern & Co. v. HerrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Cantrell v. . PinkneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API