In the Interest of M. A.

Ruffin, Judge.

The juvenile court terminated the mother’s parental rights to her three children, M. A., D. G., and A. E.1 In her sole enumeration of error on appeal, the mother contends that the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) did not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the children’s deprivation was likely to continue. As this contention lacks merit, we affirm.

In reviewing a juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights, this Court views the evidence in a light most favorable to the juvenile court’s ruling to determine whether clear and convincing evidence…