Carnabuci v. City of Norwalk
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.
In the city of Norwalk is a general zoning ordinance prohibiting the establishment or operation in districts designated therein as residential of “a store, trade or business except that of the office of a physician, surgeon, dentist, musician or other professional person rendering an approved personal service may be located in a building or an apartment used by such professional person as a private residence.” The ordinance also provided that “a billboard, sign or advertising outside of the building shall in no case be permitted.”
This ordinance duly passed, became effective on July 12, 1938.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matunuck Beach Hotel, Inc. v. SheldonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Himrod Coal Co. v. ClinganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- King v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Ridgley, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986