Legal Opinion

French v. Golston

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 1940No. 14,602PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are husband and wife. F. C. French is hereinafter referred to as French, defendant in error as Golston, the Roxy Lynn Mining Company as the company, and the property in question (the Roxy Lode Mining Claim U. S. Survey No. 11588, Lake Mining District, 1500 feet in length and containing approximately six acres) as the Roxy Lode.

December 6, 1937, Golston, alleging fee title in himself, brought ejectment against the Frenches to recover possession of the Roxy Lode. The Frenches answering admitted their possession, otherwise they denied. Furthermore they asserted title in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. CallahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Lewis v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Brown v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Bokel v. ZitnikSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Sears v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baumgartner v. ScheySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Johnson v. DunkelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. RTV, L.L.C. v. Grandote International Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Munro v. EsheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  5. Borja v. RangamarSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API