Heights at Issaquah Ridge Owners Ass'n v. Burton Landscape Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 In determining whether parties agreed to arbitrate a dispute, a court first considers whether there is a valid arbitration agreement and, if so, whether the parties’ dispute is within the scope of that agreement. Once it is determined that both criteria have been met, the court’s authority is substantially constrained and, as here, relegates questions of the timeliness of claims to the arbiter. We reverse and remand to the trial court to compel arbitration.
FACTS
¶2 Derus Wakefield I, LLC, as owner, entered into a contract (General Contract) with Sacotte Construction, Inc., to act as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Verbeek Properties, LLC v. GreenCo Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Yakima County v. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Yakima County v. Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Marriage of PascaleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.