Legal Opinion

United States v. Joshua Stafford

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2015No. 13-4188PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Following trial, Joshua Stafford was convicted of conspiring with four others to bomb a bridge near Cleveland. Stafford had a history of mental illness, but after a competency hearing the district court found him competent to stand trial. Stafford on appeal challenges the district court’s grant of his own motion, supported by his appointed counsel, to represent himself at trial. Although the district court could likely have exercised its discretion— recognized in the Supreme Court’s holding in Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. James Thomas McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. AwanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Rosaire DubruleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Kenneth H. Hart v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. United States v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Amer AlhaggagiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API