Legal Opinion

Ball v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Prosecution by affidavit and information, against the appellant, for selling intoxicating liquor to Albert G. Naylor, a minor.

A motion to quash the proceedings was properly overruled, and needs no further notice.

The appellant pleaded not guilty, was tried by a jury, convicted, and fined.

The evidence and instructions are properly before us, and errors regularly assigned questioning their validity.

Albert G. 'Naylor testified: “ My name is Albert G. Naylor ; am going to school at Waveland; live, when at home, at Terre Haute; I got liquor from the defendant, which was intoxicating; got it for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donnell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Jakes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Lindley v. BraxtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Haber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Nixon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Chipman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. De Tarr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API