Legal Opinion

United States v. Murphy

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 2, 1920PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Application by the United States for leave to file information against Frank Murphy. Granted.

1Opinion of the Court

GARVIN, District Judge.

The government applies for leave of court to file an information against the above-named defendant, charging him with a violation of title 2, section 3, Act Oct. 28, 1919 (41 Stat 308), known as the National Prohibition Law, or Volstead Act. This section provides as follows:

“No person shall, on or after the date when the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States goes Into effect, manufacture, sell, barter, transport, import, export, deliver, furnish or possess any intoxicating liquor except as authorized in this act, and all the provisions of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Gouled v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  5. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API