Legal Opinion

Antonio Amaral v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 13, 1992No. 91-2095PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Antonio Amaral, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) finding that Petitioner is deportable as an “aggravated felon” under § 241(a)(4)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)(B) [recodified as 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(A)(iii) (1990) ], and denying Petitioner’s application for a waiver of exclud-ability as a long-term lawful resident under § 212(c) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). Because Petitioner failed to file a timely appeal of the Board’s order, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lauriberto Ignacio v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Antonio Raul Ayala-Chavez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Desmond Anthony Arthurs v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Ruddys Angel Pimental-Romero, Etc. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. David Gerbier v. M. Francis Holmes, Acting District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Restrepo AguilarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Peter J. ReganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API