Legal Opinion

David W. Cromwell v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2025No. 23-0927Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0927 ══════════ David W. Cromwell, Petitioner, v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ Argued February 18, 2025 JUSTICE SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The habendum clause that can be found in any oil-and-gas lease proves that true Texans can use Latinisms, too. “The clause beginning ‘to have and to hold’ is the habendum and tenendum combined, though it is traditionally called…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API