State Ex Rel. Troy v. Lumbermen's Clinic
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
This proceeding was instituted by the prosecuting attorney of Thurston county, by way of an information in quo warranto, filed in the superior court. The action was tried upon an amended information which charged that the respondent herein, Lumbermen’s Clinic, a corporation, had illegally and unlawfully entered into contracts with numerous employers of labor, whereby respondent bound itself to render to the employees of the contractees medical and first aid services of the nature referred,to in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7724 [P. C. § 3513], infra, the information charging that respondent had no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- People Ex Rel. Los Angeles Bar Ass'n v. California Protective Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Bailey v. Master PlumbersTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Hartnett v. Plumbers' Supply Ass'n of New EnglandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Southerland v. Decimo Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,594 Milton Forman and Ellen Forman v. Community Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Southern States Cooperative, Inc. v. DaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Pig Pro Nonstock Cooperative v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.