State v. Medina
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The State of Florida appeals from an order granting Juan Medina’s motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because we find that Medina failed to satisfy the two-part test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we reverse.
In case number F05-26150, Medina was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to sell. On September 6, 2005, Medina entered a negotiated plea and was placed on drug offender probation. While on probation, Medina was arrested and charged with attempted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Nixon v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Oisorio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Lawrence v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fabian Charles Nathanials v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- JERMAINE CLARINGTON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015