United States v. Archambault
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 26) which motion was based on claims of double jeopardy, claimed violations of constitutional rights of due process and equal protection, and a claimed bill of attainder. The parties initially briefed the issues: U.S. Magistrate Judge Moreno conducted a hearing at which certain facts were stipulated and defendant was permitted to supplement the record (H. Tr. 8-10, Doc. 30). The magistrate filed and served a report and recommendation (Doc. 35), recommending that the motion be denied.
I conducted a de novo review of the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HillOneida City Court · 2002
- United States v. MedearisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002