Legal Opinion

United States v. Archambault

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 24, 2002No. CR 00-30089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KORNMANN, District Judge.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 26) which motion was based on claims of double jeopardy, claimed violations of constitutional rights of due process and equal protection, and a claimed bill of attainder. The parties initially briefed the issues: U.S. Magistrate Judge Moreno conducted a hearing at which certain facts were stipulated and defendant was permitted to supplement the record (H. Tr. 8-10, Doc. 30). The magistrate filed and served a report and recommendation (Doc. 35), recommending that the motion be denied.

I conducted a de novo review of the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HillOneida City Court · 2002
  2. United States v. MedearisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API