First National Bank of Salisbury v. Brawley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
In construing a will, the instrument should be considered from its four corners, and effect given if possible, to every clause, or phrase and word therein. Williams v. Rand, 223 N.C. 734, 28 S.E. 2d 247; Lee v. Lee, 216 N.C. 349, 4 S.E. 2d 880; Bell v. Thurston, 214 N.C. 231, 199 S.E. 93; West v. Murphy, 197 N.C. 488, 149 S.E. 731; Roberts v. Saunders, 192 N.C. 191, 134 S.E. 451; Snow v. Boylston, 185 N.C. 321, 117 S.E. 14; McCallum v. McCallum, 167 N.C. 311, 83 S.E. 350.
The primary object in interpreting a will is to ascertain what disposition the testator intended to make of his estate.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Efird v. EfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Snow v. . BoylstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Featherstone v. PassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hubbard v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.