Legal Opinion

Wiedemann v. Wiedemann

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2009No. 09-CA-41PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD A. DUFRESNE, JR., Chief Judge.

| ¿This is a suit to partition property. At issue here is the validity of an act of donation of immovable property in authentic form made by a then husband to his then wife. The trial judge found that the donee had not signed the act prior to the signing by the witnesses and notary, and entered partial summary judgment declaring the act a nullity, relying on Zamjahn v. Zamjahn, 02-871 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/28/03), 839 So.2d 309. For the following reasons we reverse that judgment.

Initially, we note that the donee designated her action in bringing the matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Zamjahn v. ZamjahnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. LayssardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Fogg v. FoggLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API