Sidwell v. Sidwell
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
I shall first consider the matter of the real estate.
- The statute expressly states that in a divorce for the aggression of the wife she shall be “restored” to-a whole or a part of her real estate. I am clearly of the opinion that in such a case the word “restored” gives to the statute a meaning that there shall be returned to the wife or that she shall be reinvested with the real estate or a part thereof which she had at the time of marriage or which she acquired during the marriage and as to which the husband had obtained some right or rights…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Bernatavicius v. BernataviciusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Alles v. LyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Hurd v. HughesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
- Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frank G.W. v. Carol M.W.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
- Mertes v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- Heinsohn v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.