State v. Hanton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcGEE, Judge
I concur with the majority’s determination of the second and third issues, but respectfully dissent as to the first issue because I disagree with the majority’s overly broad conclusion that “whether an out-of-state offense is substantially similar to a North Carolina offense is a question of law that must be determined by the trial court, not a jury.” (emphasis added).
In the present case, it appears from the record that the trial court solely conducted a comparison of the elements of the two statutes and did not appear to undertake any type of factual analysis of the circumstances underlying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.