Legal Opinion

Cross v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court. — Hon. G-. I). Burgess, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

The petition alleges that plaintiff is the owner of certain lots in the city of Brunswick, upon which there are dwelling and other houses of the value of $2,000; that said lots front on Mulberry, corner on Jackson street in said city, and that prior to the acts of defendant, herein complained of, said streets were dedicated and used as public highways; that in the year 1876 the defendant, without authority of law, and against the rights of plaintiff, wrongfully constructed its railroad track upon Mulberry street in front of said lots, and dug ditches and erected high embankments, whereby said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lackland v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Tate v. M., K. & T. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Randle v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Gashweiler v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Swenson v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rude v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Lockwood v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Glaessner v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Sheehy v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Knapp, Stout & Co. v. St. Louis Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API