Legal Opinion · Dissent

Etter v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1999No. 79A05-9811-PC-571Published

1DissentBailey, Judge

I respectfully dissent. As noted by the majority, proof of a valid suspension is an essential element of the offense of driving while suspended due to HTV status. Fields v. State, 679 N.E.2d 898, 901 n. 6 (Ind.1997); Brown v. State, 677 N.E.2d 517, 519-20 (Ind.1997). Moreover, in order to prove a valid suspension, the State must prove that the BMV mailed the notice of suspension mandated by Ind.Code § 9-30-10-5. Id. Finally, the notice of suspension mandated by Ind. Code § 9-30-10-5 must inform the driver of the right to seek judicial review of the suspension. Pebley v. State, 686 N.E.2d 168,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pebley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API