Legal Opinion

Chauncey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1994No. 1213-92PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of felony driving while intoxicated, and the trial court assessed punishment at two years confinement in the county jail, probated for eight years. Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6701Z —1(e)(2) (Vernon Supp.1992). The Eighth District Court of Appeals affirmed. Chauncey v. State 837 S.W.2d 179 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine (1) whether dual jail and restitution center terms are invalid conditions of probation under article 42.12 § 18(a) of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jaynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Pedraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Chauncey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  5. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Todd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Keith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  5. Mathis, John KentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API