Legal Opinion

Werlein v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuerie, J.

The only claim of negligence asserted by plaintiff against the defendant was the latter’s failure to equip the trackless trolley bus with windows of safety glass instead of plate glass. It is the contention of the defendant that there was no duty imposed upon it to equip the windows of its trackless trolley bus with safety glass either at common law or by statute.

We will first consider the issue of defendant’s liability at common law. The degree of care imposed upon common carriers of passengers at common law is well stated in the opinion of this court by Mr. Justice Owen in Ormond v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Jensen v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Merton v. Michigan Central RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Carson v. Green Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ormond v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Bank of Drummond v. NuesseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Victorson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Raim v. VenturaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wiener v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Furrer v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API