Legal Opinion

Marquardt v. McLean

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

The plaintiff’s motion for a preference pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted.

The defendants’ objection that the plaintiff did not seek a preference at the opening or during the term for which the case has been noticed, would if sustained, frustrate the interests of justice in this case. Therefore, in the exercise of my discretion, I am ruling against this contention. (Hanley v. Byrne Bros., 155 N. Y. S. 2d 607, 609, affd. 2 A D 2d 873 [2d Dept.].)

The objection that the preference is sought by an administratrix is without sufficient merit (Utnicki v. City of New York,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Utnicki v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smyth v. Dow Realty, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API