Legal Opinion

Burkhalter v. Matteson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,020Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Plaintiff brought suit on an attachment bond, to recover the damages consequent on seizure by attachment of 1,000 *779bushels of cqrn in an action against plaintiff for rent by one claiming as owner of the land on which the corn crop was raised. Plaintiff recovered, and defendants appeal.

The prelude to the present controversy appears in the opinion in the case of Matteson v. Johnson, 110 Kan. 50, 202 Pac. 591. Taking up the thread of the story where the first opinion- dropped it, the mandate of this court in Matteson v. Johnson was carried out.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoppas v. BremerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Cox v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Larimore v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Pachner v. HoppasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Matteson v. SweetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API