Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Harvey

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 22, 2006No. 04-0801/MCPublished

1DissentCrawford, Judge

(dissenting);

Courts-martial are public trials, and there is no prohibition against the convening authority attending a portion of the trial. I disagree with the majority that the presence of the convening authority during closing arguments is some evidence of unlawful command influence when there is no evidence the *26members either saw or recognized the convening authority.

The military judge gave the trial defense counsel an opportunity to establish that the convening authority was seen or recognized by the members. A proffer of proof by the trial defense counsel that the senior member, Captain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. BiagaseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API