Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Hutchins
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 7, 1990No. 89-1073PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants, Curtis Roberts, M.D., and Roger D. Eiland, M.D., appeal from the trial court's order denying their motion to disqualify the law firm of Pittman, Hooks, Marsh, Dutton, Hollis, P.C. ("Pitman, Hooks"), from representing the plaintiff, Sharon Hutchins, as administratrix of the estate of Freeman Hutchins, Jr., in her wrongful death medical malpractice suit against the defendants.1 We reverse and remand.
Pittman, Hooks presently represents the plaintiff. The law firm of Starnes Atchison represents the defendants. Ralph Bohannon, a lawyer and a certified registered nurse anesthetist,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte Taylor Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte America's First Credit UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by12 opinions
- Green v. Montgomery County, Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Simon v. SimonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Perry Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Ex Parte LammonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.