Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Cardwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Cross-appeals by the plaintiff, Catharine E. Sheridan,, suing, etc., and the defendant, Charles Cardwell, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on-the 17 th day of March, 1910. . A reargument was ordered in January, 1911. (See; 142 App. Div. 947.) ,:

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J.:

The reargument was granted on account of a suggested failure on the part of the court to observe that there was an ■ admission that Cogswell’s father was in actual possession at *610the time of the delivery of his deed to Husted, plaintiff’s father. Mr. Justice High, in his opinión upon the first presentation of the appeal, concluded that plaintiff’s motion for the direction of a verdict was properly denied, for these reasons: (1) That plaintiff proved neither seizin nor possession within twenty years in herself or either of her predecessors in title, as required by section 365 of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. . GorhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Smith v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Jackson ex dem. Lathrop v. DemontNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Deering v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Hasbrouck v. . BunceNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stillwell v. MorleyNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fletcher v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API