Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2009No. 06-30262Published

1Concurring in the judgmentEdith Brown Clement, Circuit Judge

I would hold that the relevant treaty provision, Article II of the Convention, is self-executing and that it therefore preempts Louisiana Revised Statute § 22:868 by virtue of the Supremacy Clause. This result is dictated by the decisions of the Supreme Court, most recently in Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491, 128 S.Ct. 1346, 170 L.Ed.2d 190 (2008), differentiating self-executing from non-self-executing treaty provisions. The conclusion that Article II is self-executing possesses the added benefit of avoiding a difficult constitutional question,1 namely what *733preemptive effect (if any)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API