Legal Opinion

Pathak v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights dated August 28, 2001, which, upon finding no probable cause to believe that the respondent Wendy’s International, Inc., engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice in firing the petitioner, dismissed the petitioner’s complaint, the respondent Wendy’s International, Inc., and the nonparties Wendy’s Old Fashioned Hamburgers of New York, Inc., and Wendy’s Food Systems, Inc., appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated June 30,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bazile v. AcinapuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Orosz v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Maltsev v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Rauch v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Matter of Horowitz v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API